jsr344-experts@javaserverfaces-spec-public.java.net

[jsr344-experts] Re: 1127-SerializeServerState PROPOSAL

From: Frank Caputo <frank_at_frankcaputo.de>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 20:23:45 +0200

Hi Ed,

+1

I like using JSF for high traffic websites, so I approve your proposal even with Mark Struberg's comment in mind.

Ciao Frank


Am 30.07.2012 um 23:00 schrieb Edward Burns:

> Mojarra issue JAVASERVERFACES-2349, filed by EG member Gerhard Petracek,
> asks to make Mojarra conform to this spec text, In section "State Saving
> Alternatives and Implications" in the "Application Integration" chapter.
>
> The default implementation Serializes the view in both the client and
> server modes.
>
> This issue has a long history, dating back to summer 2007, chronicled in
> JAVASERVERFACES-632. In that issue, then implementation lead Ryan Lubke
> stated that he polled the community and the result was that enforcing
> serializability in all cases should be off by default.
>
> At this point, I'd like to amend the text quoted above to be:
>
> The default implementation Serializes the view in client
> mode. Serializing the view in server mode is optional but must be
> possible by setting context-param javax.faces.SERIALIZE_SERVER_STATE
> to true.
>
> I hate adding another context-param, but I hate more making poor
> performance the default without a good reason for doing so.
>
> ACTION: please respond with your approval or disapproval of this
> proposal.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ed
> --
> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
> | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
>