Hi Ed,
can't we simply refer to the whole RFC 2616 and say: userAgentNeedsUpdate() SHOULD be implemented to match the rules defined in RFC 2616?
This way we stay vague, but give an intention, of what the user expects.
Ciao Frank
Am 07.08.2012 um 16:43 schrieb Edward Burns:
> Hello Experts,
>
> Resource.userAgentNeedsUpdate() is intentionally vague, to allow for
> greater freedom of implementation. I've had recent reason to desire a
> tighter specification, at least requiring the If-Modified-Since header
> to be consulted.
>
> Does anyone else think we need to tighten up the spec for this method?
>
> Ed
>
> --
> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
> | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
>