+1 for sure.
Regards,
Cagatay Civici
PrimeFaces Lead
On 28.Tem.2012, at 01:24, Kito Mann wrote:
> +1
>
> It's important that we get things right, otherwise we're stuck with them forever :-).
> ___
>
> Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
> Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting
> http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info | @jsfcentral
> +1 203-404-4848 x246
>
> * Listen to the latest headlines in the JSF and Java EE newscast: http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/roller/editorsdesk/category/JSF+and+Java+EE+Newscast
> * Sign up for the JSFCentral Newsletter: http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Edward Burns <edward.burns_at_oracle.com> wrote:
> Hello Experts,
>
> You've no doubt noticed my .signature counting down the days until I
> deliver a snapshot of the Public Review Draft (PRD) milestone of the
> specification to this list. Well, that counter reached zero on Tuesday,
> and here is a draft of the specification, but it's *not* the PRD
> version.
>
> http://java.net/projects/javaserverfaces-spec-public/downloads/download/JSF_2_2/spec_snapshots/javax.faces-api-2.2-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar
>
> A similar jar will also be uploaded as tonight's nightly spec snapshot
> (but the one on maven.java.net will not have the PDF in it).
>
> After looking into 1089-PassThroughAttributes and
> 1090-PassThroughElements, I have come to the conclusion that HTML5 is
> almost as important to JSF 2.2 as Ajax was to JSF 2.0. Not quite as
> important, but still important.
>
> I'd like to see what you all think about adding enough time to the
> schedule to get 1090-PassThroughElements done correctly for JSF 2.2.
>
> I expect another two or three months should be enough, including time to
> tighten up the other loose ends.
>
> ACTION: Please respond with your opinion of this schedule change.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ed
>
> --
> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
> | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
> | 0 Business days til JSF 2.2 Public Review to EG
>
> ---^^^ This email represents a sort of fulfilment of this promise
>