users@javaee-spec.java.net

[javaee-spec users] Fwd: [jsr366-experts] Re: new JSRs

From: Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:00:23 +0000

Cheers,
Martijn

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2 December 2014 at 13:45
Subject: Re: [javaee-spec users] [jsr366-experts] Re: new JSRs
To: jsr366-experts_at_javaee-spec.java.net


Hi Linda/All,

The LJC has concerns over the JSONP JSR and it's interaction with the
proposed JSONP implementation in Java SE. Can we get an update on this?

Cheers,
Martijn

On 1 December 2014 at 15:44, Kevin Sutter <sutter_at_us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi Linda,
> We (IBM) are in general support of these three JSR proposals. We'll start
> to identify individuals that can participate on the respective expert
> groups. Thanks.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kevin Sutter
> STSM, Java EE and Java Persistence API (JPA) architect
> mail: sutter_at_us.ibm.com, Kevin Sutter/Rochester/IBM
> http://webspherepersistence.blogspot.com/
> phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
> http://openjpa.apache.org/
>
>
>
>
> From: Linda DeMichiel <linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com>
> To: jsr366-experts_at_javaee-spec.java.net
> Date: 11/26/2014 03:58 PM
> Subject: [jsr366-experts] new JSRs
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> We have submitted to the JCP three more JSRs which we are
> targeting for inclusion in Java EE 8:
>
> * Java EE Management API 2.0, https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=373
>
> * Java API for JSON Processing 1.1, https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=374
>
> * Java EE Security API, https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=375
>
> Please let us know if your company would like to be listed as a
> supporter of any or all of these JSRs. If you are an individual
> member of this expert group, please let us know if you would like to
> be listed as an individual supporting the JSRs.
>
> thanks,
>
> -Linda
>
>
>