users@javaee-spec.java.net

[javaee-spec users] Fwd: Re: [jsr366-experts] Re: new JSRs

From: Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 20:22:06 +0000

>
> Hi Linda,
>
> Yes saw that and am happy - thanks!
>
> On Thursday, 4 December 2014, Linda DeMichiel
> <linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com <mailto:linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Martijn, Antonio, all,
>
> Please see the recent announcement on jdk9-dev,
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/__pipermail/jdk9-dev/2014-__
> December/001670.html
> <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2014-
> December/001670.html>.
>
> The JEP for lightweight JSON is being withdrawn from JDK 9.
>
> As our planned JSON-P 1.1 API evolves we will be tracking any
> developments in the future SE space with a view towards alignment.
>
> I hope that you will support the new JSON-P JSR and, should you have
> concerns about the evolution of JSON-P, hope that you will get
> involved in its expert group.
>
> regards,
>
> -Linda
>
>
> On 11/28/14 3:18 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>
> I forget exactly where I left this conversation with the OpenJDK
> / Java
> SE folks, but we'd *like* to see the Java EE std wrapping around
> the
> proposed Java SE one. EE should extend SE in this case.
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On 27 November 2014 at 08:26, Antonio Goncalves
> <antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com
> <mailto:antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> As an individual, I strongly support the two JSRs on
> security and
> management.
>
> However, I have some concerns about JSon-P : I know there
> is a JEP
> on having a "lightweight" JSon processing API in Java SE.
> What would
> be the relationship between this JEP and the JSR ?
>
> Antonio
>
> Le 27 nov. 2014 09:07, "Mite Mitreski" <
> mitemitreski_at_gmail.com
> <mailto:mitemitreski_at_gmail.com>> a écrit :
>
> Hi Linda,
>
> feel free to list JUGMK as supporter as well as myself as
> individual supporter.
>
> JUGMK - Java User Group Macedonia
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mite Mitreski
>
>
> Java User Group Macedonia (JUGMK)
> http://jug.mk | +38975236045 <tel:%2B38975236045> |
> http://blog.mitemitreski.com/
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Alexander Salvanos
> <salvanos_at_gmx.de <mailto:salvanos_at_gmx.de>> wrote:
>
> Hello Linda, Hello everybody,
>
> I am an individual member and (if possible) would
> like to be
> listed as supporter of the Java EE Security API
> aswell.
>
> Thank you,
> Alexander Salvanos
>
>
> Am 27.11.2014 um 00:05 schrieb arjan tijms:
>
> Hi,
>
> My company, ZEEF, with myself as representative
> would
> like to be
> listed as supporter of the Java EE Security API.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kind regards,
> Arjan Tijms
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Linda DeMichiel
> <linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com
> <mailto:linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> We have submitted to the JCP three more
> JSRs which
> we are
> targeting for inclusion in Java EE 8:
>
> * Java EE Management API 2.0,
> https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?____id=373
> <https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?__id=373>
> <https://jcp.org/en/jsr/__detail?id=373
> <https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=373>>
>
> * Java API for JSON Processing 1.1,
> https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?____id=374
> <https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?__id=374>
> <https://jcp.org/en/jsr/__detail?id=374
> <https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=374>>
>
> * Java EE Security API,
> https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?____id=375
> <https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?__id=375>
> <https://jcp.org/en/jsr/__detail?id=375
> <https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=375>>
>
> Please let us know if your company would
> like to be
> listed as a
> supporter of any or all of these JSRs. If
> you are
> an individual
> member of this expert group, please let us
> know if
> you would like to
> be listed as an individual supporting the
> JSRs.
>
> thanks,
>
> -Linda
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>