If the interceptors are being called correctly I see no reason to file
an issue.
JJ
On 10/23/2013 03:41 AM, Tang Yong wrote:
> Hi Bill, John, JJ
> CC: Pete, Strub,
>
> Coming back the issue, I have done a confirmation based on 10/22
> nightly glassfish distro, and I have not found interceptors are
> invoked twice.
>
> So,
>
> Pl. John confirms that whether the attachment is right doing you
> mentioned. If being right doing way, I think that we need not to file
> a bug against GlassFish( pl. JJ re-confirms it).
>
> Thanks
> Tang
>
> Bill Shannon wrote:
>> I agree, it sounds like an implementation bug. Please file a bug
>> against GlassFish <https://java.net/jira/browse/GLASSFISH>.
>>
>> Mark Struberg wrote on 10/18/13 09:13:
>>> I'd say that's an impl bug.
>>>
>>> beans.xml and @Priority only say IF and in which order the
>>> interceptor is enabled. But it still is there only once.
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From:* John D. Ament <john.d.ament_at_gmail.com>
>>> *To:* users_at_javaee-spec.java.net
>>> *Cc:* Tang Yong <tangyong_at_cn.fujitsu.com>; Pete Muir
>>> <pete.muir_at_gmail.com>; Bill Shannon <bill.shannon_at_oracle.com>
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, 17 October 2013, 15:24
>>> *Subject:* [javaee-spec users] Re: About Interceptors's enabling
>>>
>>> I wonder if this is somehow related to an issue I saw pop up on SO
>>> recently.
>>>
>>> Basically, there's an issue where if an interceptor is annotated
>>> @Priority and listed in beans.xml, it gets invoked twice.
>>>
>>> Is this the expected behavior?
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Pete Muir
>>> <pmuir_at_bleepbleep.org.uk <mailto:pmuir_at_bleepbleep.org.uk>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Tang,
>>> >
>>> > I'm afraid I don't quite understand your question :-(
>>> >
>>> > Perhaps you could provide a concrete example of what you would
>>> prefer?
>>> >
>>> > Pete
>>> >
>>> > On 17 Oct 2013, at 09:03, Tang Yong <tangyong_at_cn.fujitsu.com
>>> <mailto:tangyong_at_cn.fujitsu.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Pete
>>> >> CC: Bill
>>> >>
>>> >> I have a question about Interceptors's enabling.
>>> >>
>>> >> The story should come from [1] and [2], and from "5.3 Ordering
>>> >> Interceptors using the Priority Annotation" of JSR 318.
>>> >>
>>> >> "An interceptor bound to a component, a component method, or
>>> constructor
>>> >> using interceptor binding may be enabled for the entire
>>> application by
>>> >> applying the Priority annotation, along with a priority value,
>>> on the
>>> >> interceptor class."
>>> >>
>>> >> From another fact, Interceptors are deployment-specific and are
>>> disabled
>>> >> by default. Like alternatives, interceptors have to be
>>> >> enabled by using the CDI deployment descriptor beans.xml of the
>>> jar.
>>> >>
>>> >> Well, if I uses interceptors binding, I will meet two cases,
>>> >>
>>> >> 1) I must enable interceptors in beans.xml explicitly if I am
>>> not ready
>>> >> to use @Priority.
>>> >>
>>> >> 2) Once I uses @Priority, I need to take care of whether to
>>> need to
>>> >> declare interceptors in beans.xml becase this may break/override
>>> >> invocation order of interceptors.
>>> >>
>>> >> Based on such facts, enable interceptors in beans.xml
>>> explicitly has
>>> >> brought two different resposibilities for interceptors binding,
>>> so, for
>>> >> an user, this has caused some puzzles just as I made a mistake
>>> in [2].
>>> >>
>>> >> My question is that why we can not make "enable interceptors in
>>> >> beans.xml explicitly" bring *only one* resposibility?
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks
>>> >> Tang
>>> >>
>>> >> [1]:
>>> >>
>>> https://java.net/projects/javaee-spec/lists/jsr342-experts/archive/2012-12/message/15
>>> >> [2]: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-1528
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> －－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
>>> >> Tang Yong
>>> >> Senior Engineer
>>> >> GlassFish Committer (OSGi & OSGi-JavaEE)
>>> >> OSGi Alliance Supporter
>>> >> Blog: http://osgizone.typepad.com/tangyong/
>>> >>
>>> >> Nanjing Fujitsu NanDa Software Tec CO.,LTD
>>> >> http://www.fujitsu.com/cn/fnst
>>> >> Tel: +86-25-86630566-8310
>>> >> Fax: +86-25-83317685
>>> >> －－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>