users@javaee-spec.java.net

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: meet-up at JavaOne

From: Werner Keil <werner.keil_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:37:58 -0700

Saw it at end of several quotes.
As the Embedded Challenge with Bruno and Yara from SouJava is from 2 to 4 I
have to check, but hope to join the call as long as I can.

Werner
Am 24.09.2013 16:36 schrieb "Werner Keil" <werner.keil_at_gmail.com>:

> Thanks, so that is not an official conference event. What time?
>
> CU
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Linda DeMichiel <
> linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> Pls.see below. The meeting is tomorrow in Lombard.
>>
>>
>> On 9/24/2013 2:50 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>>
>>> Where is it? I just walked in on a bunch of Oracle execs closing a big
>>> deal :p
>>>
>>> Did the meeting move? Help? Bueller?
>>>
>>> *Jeff Genender*
>>> Savoir Technologies Inc
>>> 6480 Doris Lane <x-apple-data-detectors://0/0>
>>> Evergreen, CO 80439 <x-apple-data-detectors://0/0>
>>> +1.303.670.9800 <tel:+1-303-670-9800> x1010
>>> http://www.savoirtech.com <http://www.savoirtech.com/>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 24, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Yoon Kyung Koo <kyungkoo_yoon_at_tmax.co.kr<mailto:
>>> kyungkoo_yoon_at_tmax.co.**kr <kyungkoo_yoon_at_tmax.co.kr>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think I can attend the meeting, but I have some comment about
>>>> Java EE 8.
>>>> I read the wish-list blogs and want to share my thought.
>>>>
>>>> 1. CDI and EJB
>>>> In the long term, the whole EJB features can be replaced by CDI.
>>>> Currently, only the distributed (or remote) object model cannot be
>>>> replaced by CDI.
>>>> I think if Clustered or Distributed CDI bean is possible and can be
>>>> standardized, then the old EJB model can be removed.
>>>>
>>>> 2. unified(?) configuration
>>>> I think an extensible but a standardized configuration is a very good
>>>> thing.
>>>>
>>>> 3. batch and EE concurrency
>>>> I think the batch model in the Java EE can be more refined and further
>>>> developed with EE concurrency model or Java SE
>>>> 8 concurrency (parallelism?).
>>>> I don't think Java EE 7 batch is fully integrated into the platform.
>>>>
>>>> 4. lambda support
>>>> I didn't think much about the lambda support of Java EE 8 platform, but
>>>> it would be a great challenge.
>>>>
>>>> Have a great time, everyone.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Yoon Kyung Koo (TmaxSoft)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --------------------
>>>> Software Innovation Driver
>>>> Researcher & Executive Director / WAS Lab / TmaxSoft R&D Center
>>>> PGP http://www.javadom.com/**personal/**yoonforhatgmaildotcom.asc<http://www.javadom.com/personal/yoonforhatgmaildotcom.asc>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013. 9. 11., 4:30, Linda DeMichiel <linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com<mailto:
>>>> linda.demichiel@**oracle.com <linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com>>> ۼ:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>
>>>>> As requested, we've reserved a spot where we can meet up
>>>>> at JavaOne to talk about ideas for Java EE 8.
>>>>>
>>>>> We've reserved the Lombard room in Parc 55 on Wednesday Sept 25
>>>>> for a 2:30-4:30 meeting.
>>>>>
>>>>> While we're not limiting attendance to Expert Group members, the room
>>>>> itself is of limited size, so please let us know if you are planning
>>>>> to attend.
>>>>>
>>>>> We're expecting that the first item for the meeting will be to
>>>>> converge on the meeting agenda. As another item (possibly to get the
>>>>> ball rolling), we'd like to suggest that we discuss the wish-lists
>>>>> that were posted to the group earlier, namely:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://arjan-tijms.blogspot.**de/2013/07/java-ee-8-wish-**list.html<http://arjan-tijms.blogspot.de/2013/07/java-ee-8-wish-list.html>
>>>>> and
>>>>> http://antoniogoncalves.org/**2013/07/18/java-ee-8-whislist/<http://antoniogoncalves.org/2013/07/18/java-ee-8-whislist/>
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> -Linda
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>