users@javaee-spec.java.net

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: ConnectionFactoryDefinition

From: Antonio Goncalves <antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:25:24 +0100

+1

Antonio

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Markus Eisele <myfear_at_web.de> wrote:

> +1 nothing to say against it!
>
> - M
>
> On 30 January 2013 20:38, Linda DeMichiel <linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com>
> wrote:
> > The Connector spec lead, with the support of the Connector EG, has
> > requested that we adopt a more fleshed out version of the
> > current ConnectorResourceDefinition metadata (currently described in
> > section EE.5.19.7 of the Java EE Platform specification).
> >
> > The proposed changes are the rename of the metadata, from
> > ConnectorResourceDefinition (and connector-resource deployment
> > descriptor element) to ConnectionFactoryDefinition (and
> > connection-factory) and the addition of resourceAdapterName,
> > maxPoolSize, minPoolSize, and transactionSupport elements.
> > This brings our support for connector resource definition metadata more
> > in line with our other resource definition metadata support.
> > (You can view the details in the updated javadocs, which are available at
> >
> http://java.net/projects/connector-spec/downloads/download/connector-1_7-working-draft-1-javadoc.zip
> > )
> >
> >
> > Please let me know by the end of the week if for any reason you are
> > opposed to this change. I otherwise plan to update the spec.
> > The new annotation will be submitted with the Connector 1.7 MR.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > -Linda
> >
> >
>



-- 
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect and Java Champion
Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> |
Twitter<http://twitter.com/agoncal>|
LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris
JUG<http://www.parisjug.org> |
Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr>