Hi Christian,
Thanks very much for your review and feedback. More below....
On 1/10/2013 10:59 AM, schaarsc_at_gmx.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I read section 6.1.2 of JSR-342 compared it with Related document section +
> jcp.org and found some confusing information concerning versions. Versions do
> not match. Could you shed some light on this? Which version is correct?
>
> JavaT Servlet Specification, Version 3.2 (Servlet specification). Available at
> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=340.
"3.2" is a bug; it should be "3.1"
> But according to jcp.org 340 is Servlet 3.1
>
> JavaServer PagesT Specification, Version 2.2 (JSP specification). Available at
> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=245.
> But EE6.1.2 requires 2.3. what jsr is JSP2.3?
>
We will be doing a Maintenance Release of this spec, which will cause the version increment when posted.
> JavaT Transaction API, Version 1.2 (JTA specification). Available at
> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=907
> But according to jcp.org 907 is JTA 1.0.1
>
We will be doing a Maintenance Release of this spec as well. If you download the lastest version from
the JCP site, that should show as version 1.1.
> JavaMailT API Specification Version 1.5 (JavaMail specification). Available at
> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=919
> But according to jcp.org 919 is JavaMail 1.4
>
This spec will also be undergoing a Maintenance Release, which will cause a version increment.
> Java EET Connector Architecture 1.7 (Connector specification). Available at
> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=322
> But according to jcp.org 322 is JCA 1.6
>
This is also undergoing an MR.
> Common Annotations for the Java Platform Specification 1.2. Available at
> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=250.
> But according to jcp.org 250 is Common Annotations 1.1
>
Same here.
> Interceptors 1.2 (Interceptors specification). Available at
> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=318
> But according to jcp.org 318 is EJB3.1 Spec
>
Interceptors is also undergoing an MR. We are not yet sure of the "home" for the new
version, so the reference here will need to be updated once we do.
> Regards,
> Christian
I hope this helps clarify, and thanks again for your careful review and catching that bug.
regards,
-Linda