+1
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir_at_bleepbleep.org.uk> wrote:
> We would agree with your proposal:
>
> JSR full Platform Web Profile
> ---- ------------- ----------
> JSON-P [X] [X]
> Web Socket [X] [X]
> Batch [X] [ ]
>
> We would also raise the issue of whether JAX-RS should be in the web
> profile again, as it's a natural match for it (more and more apps use the
> REST architecture for writing web apps), especially if JSON-P is there.
>
>
> On 11 Sep 2012, at 01:04, Linda DeMichiel wrote:
>
> >
> > We have a number of new JSRs in flight that we expect to complete
> > within the Java EE 7 time frame and that we believe are appropriate
> > for inclusion in the Java EE Platform -- namely:
> > * Java API for JSON Processing 1.0 (JSR 353)
> > * Java API for Web Socket 1.0 (JSR 356)
> > * Batch Applications for the Java Platform 1.0 (JSR 352)
> >
> > JSON-P 1.0 and Web Socket 1.0 are also both logically candidates
> > for inclusion in the Web Profile.
> >
> > Please let us know if you support adding these technologies to the
> > full Java EE 7 Platform and Web Profile.
> >
> > JSR full Platform Web Profile
> > ---- ------------- ----------
> > JSON-P [ ] [ ]
> > Web Socket [ ] [ ]
> > Batch [ ] [ ]
> >
> >
> > Note that we certainly would also like to include JCACHE (JSR 107),
> > Concurrency Utilities for Java EE (JSR 236), and Java State Management
> > (JSR 350), but at this time we are less certain about their readiness
> > in the Java EE 7 timeframe. Hopefully, however, we will be able to
> > ask you about their inclusion in the coming months.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > -Linda
>
>