users@javaee-spec.java.net

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: Logs. Should we finally do something ?

From: Antonio Goncalves <antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:49:22 +0200

I like the idea of standardizing staging in all the specs (and not just
JSF) and I also like the idea of using this staging for log levels (instead
of FINEST, TRACE or whatever). But again, that would mean having a standard
way accross Java EE to define staging and log levels

On Sunday, April 15, 2012, Adam Bien wrote:

> Hi Antonio,
>
> whats about coupling the log settings to "run levels"?
>
> Every application server I know comes with "development" and "production"
> stage.
>
> We could rely on the spec packages and use then something like:
>
> javax.ejb=production (whatever it means for Log4j -> mapping would be
> server-specific)
> javax.rs=development
> javax.enterprise.inject (but now org.weld)
>
> etc.
>
> I see a problem with your proposals, that the specifiied log levels do not
> have to be available for each framework (log4j, java logging, etc.).
>
> thoughts?
>
> adam
> On 09.03.2012, at 15:43, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We are in 2012 and I just spent a few hours trying to display the logs
> of an application on GlassFish 3.1.2 and JBoss 7.1.0 (and it's not the
> first time in my career). Modules to exclude in one, jars to add in the
> WEB-INF/lib on the other... or to exclude. And of course, that's just my
> application Log4j logs. If I want to have more logs on javax.ejb I need to
> setup a different file in JBoss and another one in GlassFish.
> >
> > I know javax.util.logging exists in Java SE but nobody tends to use it
> (despite GlassFish uses it and JBoss has a brand new logger that wraps
> java.util.logging), I know we can happily choose from 10 fashionable brand
> new logging frameworks... but really, it's a pain. Every application uses
> logs. Every framework uses logs. Every Java EE spec implementation uses
> logs. For an application to be portable across app servers, for a
> configuration file to be portable across Java EE specs, we should do
> something.
> >
> > I would love to write :
> >
> > javax.ejb.level = debug
> > javax.persistence.level = debug
> > org.weld.level = debug
> > my.app.level = debug
> >
> > Add this config file under WEB-INF/classes and don't worry about
> anything else... and have the same behavior under GlassFish, JBoss or
> whatever.
> >
> > Logging frameworks have been a battle since day one and it's one of the
> things that make me feel the Java ecosystem is too complex and is slowly
> fading from developers/ops concerns. Gosh, I just want to display some
> logs, why do I have to choose from 10 different frameworks and why should I
> battle with app server configuration.
> >
> > Isn't it the role of the Java EE spec to make the other spec agree to a
> standard ? And what about logging ?
> >
> > Antonio
>
>

-- 
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect and Java Champion
Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> |
Twitter<http://twitter.com/agoncal>|
Blog <http://feeds.feedburner.com/AntonioGoncalves> |
LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal>| Paris
JUG <http://www.parisjug.org>