users@javaee-spec.java.net

[javaee-spec users] Re: [jsr342-experts] Re: Re: Datasources and other resources defined on CDI beans

From: Pete Muir <pmuir_at_bleepbleep.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:20:24 +0000

It's not really up to CDI to support this, support would be in Java EE.

On 6 Jan 2012, at 19:16, Antonio Goncalves wrote:

> I will file an issue but the purpose of my email was really to have @Alternative on a @DataSourceDefinition (and JMS definitions in the future). Something that sounded obvious to me (having several alternatives definitions) is not possible in CDI 1.0. Hope it will be in 1.1.
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 19:37, Pete Muir <pmuir_at_bleepbleep.org.uk> wrote:
> If you file an issue at http://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK we can add some tests to the CDI TCK for @DataSourceDefinition.
>
> On 6 Jan 2012, at 18:35, reza_rahman_at_lycos.com wrote:
>
> > Although, if I recall correctly there was no TCK test for this...
> >
> > Jan 6, 2012 01:32:22 PM, jsr342-experts_at_javaee-spec.java.net wrote:
> > It's basically a bug I think -- we implemented what you are looking for in Resin. I think the Java EE platform spec is pretty clear about @DataSourceDefinition on plain managed beans, Servlets, EJB.
> >
> > Jan 6, 2012 03:05:45 AM, jsr342-experts_at_javaee-spec.java.net wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just came accross a limitation (bug) of GlassFish : adding a @DataSourceDefinition on a CDI bean doesn't work in an embedded environment (http://www.java.net/forum/topic/glassfish/glassfish/invalid-resource-datasource-embedded-mode). I had to put it in the EJB to make it work.
> >
> > Why do I use @DataSourceDefinition on a CDI bean instead of an EJB ? Because I thought I could use alternatives (i.e. defining several data sources depending on the environment). But this doesn't work in CDI 1.0 (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-53).
> >
> > Alternatives should work on definitions, don't you think ? In other specs, are you aware of other kind of definitions (I know that JMS 2.0 will bring similar features with @JMSConnectionFactoryDefinition and @JMSDestinationDefinition) ? If yes, we should encourage the spec leads to use similar behavior.
> >
> > My 2 cents
> >
> > --
> > Antonio Goncalves
> > Software architect and Java Champion
> >
> > Web site | Twitter | Blog | LinkedIn | Paris JUG
>
>
>
>
> --
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect and Java Champion
>
> Web site | Twitter | Blog | LinkedIn | Paris JUG