On 10/8/15 3:39 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
> Linda DeMichiel <linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com> wrote on 10/08/2015
> 05:23:49 PM:
>
>
> > ... (Note that these
> > updates do not include any related to the currently in-flight
> > discussions around Proposed Optionality of CORBA).
> >
>
> Wouldn't the inclusion of this Proposed Optionality of CORBA possibly
> generate more of the feedback that you are looking for? The majority of
> the feedback received thus far is in favor of making CORBA optional.
> So, why not include it in the draft? The wider audience for the
> draftr may generate more feedback than just our user community. Just a
> thought...
>
Well, there has been some discussion to the contrary in the EG and on
the users list, so I am reluctant to include it until there is
further discussion at least.
Also, I would like to raise this issue in my JavaOne talk and our BOF to
see what feedback we get there.
> -- Kevin Sutter