Hi Antonio,
I like the idea but I am not sure if this is a good one to everybody.
There is already some kind of "logo". The compatibility logo
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javaee/overview/compatibility-jsp-136984.html
Introducing an additional one would have the drawback that both needs
to be aligned in order
to have a high recognition value and prevent confusion.
A word towards JSF. The difference here to me is, that Ed sees Mojarra
as a separate product.
So he has every right and an interest to have a separate marketing
approach here. For Java EE there are
the compatible implementations which make up Java EE. Not sure if I
hit the point here clear enough.
What I would support is, that we start using the compatibility logo
without the word "compatible"
as a visual for all official documents, java.net project and so on.
I would highly appreciate if Linda or Bill could provide additional
support from Oracle's marketing/design
team here to find a good/matching logo combination!
Thanks,
Markus
On 10 April 2012 10:46, Antonio Goncalves <antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Something "lighter" to talk about. I find it a shame that Java EE doesn't
> have a graphical representation. I remember few years ago when JSF created
> their logo asking the community.
>
> What do you think ? Shall we blog about that and see if the community comes
> up with something nice ? Is the idea of having a logo useless ?
>
> Antonio