users@javaee-security-spec.java.net

[javaee-security-spec users] [jsr375-experts] Re: Migration from java.net

From: Werner Keil <werner.keil_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:39:33 +0200

Btw. not sure if it would be a great effort or e.g. the Jersey team could
help us (and Will or Alex), Jersey also has most of its development on
GitHub now, but https://github.com/jersey/jersey/ suggests, the mirror
works both ways.

Something like that would make it easier for 375, too;-)

Regards,
Werner


On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:20 PM, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Aside from a possible replacement host, what can the EG do to help EDR 1
>> of JSR 375 before a Renewal Ballot would be due?
>>
>
> I guess that writing the spec document would be an important thing to do.
> I can surely do that, but then would be great if the new spec lead could
> then indeed submit it (perhaps after making some edits if needed).
>
>
>
>> The RI Soteria looks in pretty good shape IMO.
>> Ideally the "embedded" API folder in Soteria should be moved or at least
>> copied into the "spec-api" repository, whether on java.net (mirrored to
>> Github) or directly to GitHub is a minor detail.
>>
>
> Indeed, something that should still be done regardless.
>
> Kind regards,
> Arjan Tijms
>
>
>
>
>>
>> A few JSRs (like 330, 310 or JSON-P currently in JSR 374) never published
>> a plain text spec in a separate document, anything they documented is in
>> JavaDoc so far. It may not be suitable for JSR 375, but the spec document
>> could be short or left out of an EDR1.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Werner
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 7:57 PM, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the update Bill!
>>>
>>> If there's anything I (or any of the EG) can do to help let me/us know.
>>>
>>> Migrating the JIRA issues manually should be doable for JSR 375,
>>> although if more projects are to be moved that way, specially one that have
>>> a very old JIRA with literally thousands of issues (like Mojarra), looking
>>> at something automated wouldn't hurt really.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Arjan Tijms
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Bill Shannon <bill.shannon_at_oracle.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This subject is under very active discussion at Oracle, but we have
>>>> nothing to announce at this time, nor any schedule to share.
>>>>
>>>> Werner Keil wrote on 10/10/16 4:01 AM:
>>>>
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>
>>>> JSR 380 Spec Lead Gunnar Morling just mentioned VisualVM had migrated
>>>> from java.net to GitHub: https://visualvm.github.io/
>>>>
>>>> A project officially run and hosted by Oracle. Is it safe to assume,
>>>> others will follow, or do other migration plans exist especially for Java
>>>> EE (Glassfish) related projects and JSRs?
>>>>
>>>> JSR 375 is actually in a rather lucky position since it's relatively
>>>> new and has not so much history on java.net as other JSRs.
>>>>
>>>> JIRA is used by JSR 375, but 36 tickets as of now seem like they could
>>>> be migrated to e.g. GitHub issue tracker without a massive effort.
>>>>
>>>> Waffle (see https://waffle.io/unitsofmeasurement/unit-ri for JSR 363
>>>> RI, it only recently moved from JIRA, so there are not so many tickets, as
>>>> the JSR is final, we may stick to the tarball or other archives for
>>>> historic tickets) allows to put an "agile" layer and it's probably not the
>>>> only solution of that kind for the GitHub tracker.
>>>>
>>>> Btw. as of Friday, the Spec Lead change was updated on jcp.org :-)
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> Werner
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>