users@javaee-security-spec.java.net

[javaee-security-spec users] [jsr375-experts] Re: Feedback from actual users

From: arjan tijms <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:34:26 +0200

Hi,

True, although it remains an option that Oracle migrates/exports the
existing archived mails to somewhere. If this doesn't become clear before a
given date, we should actively export them ourselves I guess. I think we
should best discuss a location with the other EGs.

Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms


On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This is quite clear about the future of java.net:
> https://community.oracle.com/community/java/javanet-forge-sunset
>
> As only project owners can do this, I assume Alex will have to help us
> before it stops, but it sounds reasonable to start using Google Groups
> lists only very soon. The text archive of all prior conversations may be
> available somewhere (we could even put it on the GitHub page under
> github.io) but *The Java.net and Kenai.com forges will be going dark on
> April 28, 2017. *
> means those sites and all infrastructure will be GONE after that, shut
> down completely, not just read only.
>
> Regards,
> Werner
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Arjan/all,
>>
>> Thanks for the update. I plan to do when I can. Unfortunately the
>> enthusiasm by events (including and especially JavaOne) we proposed JSR 375
>> to was not so great as you know. I did extensive live demos for prior
>> events like Codemotion in Tel Aviv, but of course the code changed a bit.
>>
>> Hopefully the announcement around critical aspects for the Cloud like
>> Security means that some goals of JSR 375 are also appreciated and further
>> supported by Oracle. Either as Spec Lead or a more active EG member than it
>> was in the past few months.
>>
>> I don't know who actually has commit rights or can add things, but
>> eventually this could also be an interesting case for the Microprofile
>> repo. However, JSR 375 and Security aspects in general seem to big for the
>> "minimal" profile, so let's see how that fleshes out before discussing
>> other profiles for it.
>>
>> Btw. I copied the Google Groups list, since despite all of Oracle's
>> positive signals, there is no indication that java.net gets a lifeline
>> beyond April, so we don't know what's going to happen to the
>> "javaee-security-spec" project on java.net or the mailing list.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Werner
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:11 PM, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> For those who haven't seen it yet, here's some feedback from a user
>>> actually trying Soteria:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/javaee-security-spec/soteria/issues/9
>>>
>>> There's quite an amount of interesting feedback there, and some issues
>>> are brought to the surface that I think we should try to solve.
>>>
>>> Would also be great if more of the EG members actually tried to use
>>> Soteria for an actual (example) application, as there's typically quite an
>>> amount of things you encounter then.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Arjan Tijms
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Java EE Security API - JSR 375 - Experts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to jsr375-experts+unsubscribe_at_googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to jsr375-experts_at_googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jsr375-experts/CAAGawe3yfW08DuXLLB1%3Dvj2N58jLPmjMb6L086LZatjOegMFvQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jsr375-experts/CAAGawe3yfW08DuXLLB1%3Dvj2N58jLPmjMb6L086LZatjOegMFvQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>