Alex/all,
Thanks, looks good. We're invited to give a brief overview to the EC on
Monday in London. The EC is not too technical, but maybe a diagram or two
might be nice for giving them an idea what's currently worked on.
You mentioned you met Ron and discussed possible synergies. Unless you
already had that in mind internally, the Java EE 8 timeline has since been
shifted by several months. If JSR 351 was able to make that, or even came
as a possible addition/module to EE (7 or 8) later, having
javax.security.idm and javax.security.identity.* may seem cause a bit of
confusion;-O I understand it is exactly that package name under PicketLink
and abbrivation for "IDentity Management", but maybe PicketLink doesn't
have a separate module defining a package "org.picketlink.identity" next to
"org.picketlink.idm" there?;-)
Beside that I'll comment in the Google Doc.
Regards,
Werner
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Alex Kosowski <alex.kosowski_at_oracle.com>
wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
> I have been working on an Identity Store proposal for which I would like
> your comments. Basically, I am proposing we model the Identity Store after
> PicketLink IdM.
>
> The proposal is published as a Google doc here:
>
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1D9awD7DjMTctRWXrNKUgSw_tEDlHISr69-U8L8rGyBo&authuser=0
>
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D9awD7DjMTctRWXrNKUgSw_tEDlHISr69-U8L8rGyBo/edit?usp=sharing>
> The proposal prototype is available here:
>
> https://github.com/javaee-security-spec/javaee-security-proposals/tree/master/identity-store
>
> The proposal Google doc should be open for comments by anyone on the
> jsr375-experts_at_googlegroups.com Google group. If you are having trouble
> commenting, please let me know. To comment, click the Comments button on
> the top right of the document.
>
> Note that I ran out of time, and Section 12 Attribute Management (and
> further) are currently marked "To Be Determined". I will get back to that.
>
> Regarding JSR 351 Identity API, I propose that JSR 351 would be integrated
> later (when available) as an IdentityStore implementation via the SPI.
> IdentityStore SPI could also be the integration point for server-specific
> identity stores. See the proposal to see what I mean by IdentityStore SPI.
>
> Please read the proposal and comment in the document.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
>