Hi Ivar and Werner and the Security EG
Just in case it hasn't made the catalog yet, I wanted to let you know
that we will be giving a conference session on the Security JSR
"Security for Java EE 8 and the Cloud" (CON7978) presented by KK
Sriramadhesikan. This will be Tuesday at 5:30 in the Mission conference
room (of course, check the conference schedule in case the schedule
changes).
I will check with Heather about setting up a face to face. I'll respond
when I know if this is feasible.
Also, just in case it isn't clear: anyone here, is also welcome to also
offer feedback via the public Java EE Platform EG e-mail list. You are
welcome to join that list if you aren't already a member, via (this link
<mailto:sympa_at_javaee-spec.java.net?subject=subscribe%20users> just hit
send after the mail client dialog opens), or if you just wish to
comment, send e-mail to users_at_javaee-spec.java.net.
We appreciate the support you have given this EG and look forward to the
collaborations we have before us.
-- Ed Bratt,
(Senior Development Manager, Oracle)
On 8/24/2016 2:20 AM, Werner Keil wrote:
> I'm just about to ask Heather, all EG members who are known to be
> there are CC so we can find a date that's best for everyone (e.g.
> nobody having a talk ;-D)
>
> Werner
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Ivar Grimstad
> <ivar.grimstad_at_gmail.com <mailto:ivar.grimstad_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> +1 to a F2F meeting!
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:14 AM Werner Keil
> <werner.keil_at_gmail.com <mailto:werner.keil_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> I'm not sure, if Jeff is likely Oracle's new Spec Lead for JSR
> 375 or just a "messenger", but the message for this JSR and
> its goals towards Java EE 8 at least include "O-Auth and
> OpenID Connect support" by the time the EE 8 release train is
> scheduled.
>
> David already spoke about possible adjustments to the exact
> scope or requirements of JSRs like 375 when he mentioned it at
> JavaLand, but he also called it "Cloud relevant" and so did
> other sources at Oracle. And it is quite unlikely the aims like
>
> "O-Auth and OpenID Connect" can be reached elsewhere.
> Java EE 8 is supposed to run on Java SE 8, so a new "JEP" or SE 9 module is out of the question.
> JSR 351 (Identity Management where AFAIR OpenID was also experimented with) was withdrawn by Spec Lead Oracle,
> which leaves JSR 375 as its natural heir and successor.
> spoke
>
> Many of us including Ivar, Adam, David or myself are speakers at JavaOne.
> Red Hat, IBM and Oracle will obviously be there, too, regardless of the inviduals representing them in the EG.
>
> Are those who come to JavaOne happy to do a F2F meeting offered by Heather to Spec Lead and Experts?
>
> Sorry that Arjan does not seem to be there, but I recall the conference rooms have both audio and Wifi, so ideally he and others who cannot attend in person could also join the meeting by phone, Skype or Hangout.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Werner
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Jeff Tancill
> <jeff.tancill_at_oracle.com <mailto:jeff.tancill_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> FYI
>
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: [javaee-spec users] [jsr366-experts] update to
>> Java EE 8 plan
>> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:05:23 -0700
>> From: Bill Shannon <bill.shannon_at_oracle.com>
>> <mailto:bill.shannon_at_oracle.com>
>> Reply-To: jsr366-experts_at_javaee-spec.java.net
>> <mailto:jsr366-experts_at_javaee-spec.java.net>
>> To: jsr366-experts_at_javaee-spec.java.net
>> <mailto:jsr366-experts_at_javaee-spec.java.net>
>>
>>
>>
>> As many of you have read in the press [1], Oracle is reevaluating the
>> scope and plans for Java EE 8. Based on the changes we've seen in the
>> industry in recent years, we believe we need to do more to Java EE to
>> make it better suited for developing the next generation of cloud
>> and microservices applications.
>>
>> The current generation of enterprise Java applications is already well
>> supported by Java EE 7 in cloud services provided by Oracle and
>> others. As Anil Gaur said in his recent presentation to the JCP EC [2]:
>>
>> We would like the future of Java EE to be viable to next generation
>> of applications. These apps are composed and deployed differently
>> in cloud and require flexibility, reliability and scale. The
>> platform needs a new programming model that's geared towards
>> reactive style programming for building large-scale distributed
>> applications that are loosely coupled. In addition, we would like
>> to see HTTP/2, Config, State management, Eventual Consistency,
>> Multi-tenancy, O-Auth and OpenID Connect get included in the
>> platform.
>>
>> It is critical that Java EE reflect the needs of the community. We are
>> preparing another community survey, similar to the survey we did in
>> 2014 [3], to assess whether the community shares our views about
>> what's needed in Java EE. We expect this survey to be available in
>> the next few weeks. We'll also be looking at the results of other
>> surveys and community input, and will be continuing our discussions
>> with Java EE licensees. At JavaOne we'll be presenting our proposals
>> for updates to Java EE and gathering feedback from attendees.
>>
>> After considering the results of our survey and other feedback, we'll
>> adjust the plans for Java EE 8, with a goal of delivering Java EE 8
>> within a year. Much of the initially planned work is nearly complete
>> or well on its way, but new work will need to be done more quickly than
>> usual. Obviously all desired work will not be able to be done in Java
>> EE 8 and some planned work may no longer be important.
>>
>> This short schedule for Java EE 8 will allow us to move quickly into
>> planning for Java EE 9, which will be able to take advantage of the
>> Java SE 9 Jigsaw module system, and will give us more time for some of
>> the larger improvements to the Java EE programming model.
>>
>> Stay tuned for more information about our community survey, and join us
>> at JavaOne to hear more about our proposals for Java EE.
>>
>> Your opinion is valuable to us and we look forward to collaborating with you.
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> http://www.infoworld.com/article/3098007/java/oracle-to-reboot-java-ee-for-the-cloud.html
>> <http://www.infoworld.com/article/3098007/java/oracle-to-reboot-java-ee-for-the-cloud.html>
>> [2]
>> https://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/ec-public/materials/2016-08-09/August-2016-Public-Minutes.html
>> <https://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/ec-public/materials/2016-08-09/August-2016-Public-Minutes.html>
>> [3]https://blogs.oracle.com/ldemichiel/
>> <https://blogs.oracle.com/ldemichiel/>
>
> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups "Java EE Security API - JSR 375 - Experts"
> group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
> emails from it, send an email to
> jsr375-experts+unsubscribe_at_googlegroups.com
> <mailto:jsr375-experts+unsubscribe_at_googlegroups.com>. To post
> to this group, send email to jsr375-experts_at_googlegroups.com
> <mailto:jsr375-experts_at_googlegroups.com>. To view this
> discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jsr375-experts/CAAGawe2oSmPmLiN8_sRzbD9QxNE0feYwf_xkQOc0imksZ6G%2B_Q%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jsr375-experts/CAAGawe2oSmPmLiN8_sRzbD9QxNE0feYwf_xkQOc0imksZ6G%2B_Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>