I am surprised that @ContractsProvided does not do exactly what you seem
to want. Do you have a test case? Because it seems like
@ContractsProvided should work exactly how you say it should work...
On 1/3/2014 1:04 AM, buko wrote:
>
> I have several interfaces in my domain and I'd like to provide
> hk2-aware implementations of said interfaces. But I'd rather not
> annotate such key domain interfaces with @Contract since it leaks
> implementation into the domain. I had thought @ContractsProvided
> provided a very nice way around this -- on the implementation class I
> could explicitly indicate a certain interface was a contract an
> provided by this component. But this does doesn't work at all. It
> seems @ContractProvided still requires the actual interface to be
> marked as a @Contract.
>
> Maybe ContractProvided is not the right way to do this but how can I
> indicate a certain interface is supplied by a component via an
> annotation? This stems from a strong desire to be able just use
> addActiveDescriptor(Component.class) in binders and not have to use
> explicit bind syntax.