Keep 'em coming!
We'd like to close on this by the end of the week, so we'd like to hear
from more of you.
On 4/12/11 2:42 AM, stefano wrote:
> git, thumbs up.
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Ryan Lubke<ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com> wrote:
>> Hey Folks,
>>
>> Some of you may have noticed that for several weeks we had switched over
>> to Git for Grizzly 2.0 scm services. Some of you may have *also* noticed
>> that towards the middle of this week, we started using Mercurial.
>>
>> I won't bore you with the details as to why the switch from Git to
>> Mercurial was made, however, at this point in time we now have approval
>> to use
>> what community would prefer (i.e., if the community prefers Git, then
>> that's what we'll go with or vice versa).
>>
>> My two cents on the topic:
>> - Functionally, no clear winner in my book.
>> - Tooling: I've found the mercurial plugin within Intellij to be
>> lacking
>> in some features that I enjoyed while using Git.
>> - Adoption/Growth: Git appears to have the larger portion of mindshare.
>>
>>
>> So, what would you, members of the community, prefer to use going forward?
>>
>> [ ] Git
>> [ ] Mercurial
>>
>> Please cast your votes!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -rl
>>
>>
>>