That sounds about right actually. Odd that the ordering would vary so
wildly. I'll update and retry preparing the release on java 5 and see
how it goes. Thanks, Alexey.
On 4/16/10 6:07 AM, Oleksiy Stashok wrote:
> I've fixed the http module tests. The problem was that one of the
> tests didn't shutdown a server connection properly, so following tests
> fail. In JDK5 that test was always run as first, in JDK6 - among last,
> that's why we saw the issue on JDK 5.
> For sure this is true, if I saw the same issue as you did.
>
> WBR,
> Alexey.
>
>
> On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:48 , Oleksiy Stashok wrote:
>
>>> OK. So i have some questions for everyone. We dont have to answer
>>> them now, but perhaps at next week's tech meeting if us Oracle types
>>> are not tied up in planning meetings next week.
>>> Given that the tests don't run successfully on 1.5 for some strange
>>> reason, do we want to maintain 1.5 compatibility for the 1.9
>>> branch? I'm currently running a release on a 1.6 VM and targetting
>>> the 1.5 byte code. While this generates (hopefully) 1.5 compliant
>>> byte code, it doesn't really catch when we use 1.6 only classes like
>>> I did in websockets. If everyone still needs 1.5 compatbility I
>>> guess we can hobble along like this. I know we talked about that a
>>> while back but it's still a burr in my saddle so to speak that we
>>> have to jump through hoops like this. If we stay with 1.5, we need
>>> to figure out why the tests crash on a 1.5 VM.
>> I'd stay with 1.5, as it was planned time ago. I'll take a look at
>> failures and try to fix them asap.
>> BTW I see tests pass fine with 1.9.18-x, but fail with 1.9.19 trunk,
>> is it what you're seeing?
>>
>>> Does anyone have any objections to me migrating our tests from junit
>>> to testng? I much prefer testng and we get quite a bit more control
>>> and features for very little effort. This is probably the least
>>> contentious of the two but I wanted to throw that out there.
>> I'm ok with testng migration. AFAIR we use it with grizzly-config and
>> nobody had problems with them. As for Netbeans - I didn't fill any
>> diff. comparing to junit.
>>
>> WBR,
>> Alexey.
>
>