Thanks. Been looking forward for WebSocket support. I'll be giving it a
spin.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Justin Lee <Justin.Lee_at_sun.com> wrote:
> This morning I committed basic support for websockets to the trunk. It's
> located in modules/websockets and is more or less ready to be played with.
> There are a few basic unit tests included. Probably the most interesting
> is WebSocketFilterTest.testSimpleConversation. It's a servlet-based
> approach in which the servlet is largely unaware of the underlying
> websockets work. This works well enough, but it does impose a slight burden
> on the servlet author. This attempted complete transparency does lead to a
> little bit of awkwardness in use, however.
>
> So now that it's working, we'll be doing some work on the API itself to
> provide a cleaner way to register your components for use in a websockets
> conversation. So please play with it and give some feedback. We'd like to
> have a nice, clean API we can all live with so if you have any input now's
> the time. I'll be looking over what jeanfrancois has done with atmosphere
> and jetty to see how much we can borrow. Any suggestions are completely
> welcome. I want this to be useful and usable for someone other than myself.
> :)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>
>
--
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape
finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. - Marcus Aurelius