Salut,
before we forgot, I've filled an issue:
https://grizzly.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=176
We should work on it pretty soon! The only issue I can see with such
approach is that we will create much more byte buffers than with the
sync approach (one buffer per thread). With Async, we gonna need a pool
of bb....
Thanks!
-- Jeanfrancois
Andy Thomas wrote:
> Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>> Salut,
>>
>> Oleksiy Stashok wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> do you want to send HTTP response from inside the GrizzlyAdapter?
>>> Jeanfrancois can correct if I'm wrong, but IMHO it's not possible
>>> right now, though it could be interesting to have such possibility?
>>> Jeanfrancois, what do you think? :)
>>
>> Right, this should be really easy to implement using the async queue
>> the framework module. Let me take a look today and try to comes with
>> something :-)
>>
>> A+
>>
>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>
> Hi,
>
> Yep - that would be great.
>
> I was trying to find a way of sending async HTTP response from within
> the Adapter. I could not find a way of getting hold of the async write
> queues whilst in the adapter - I guess something (but what?) needs to be
> placed in the Request Context?
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andy.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>