Harsha Godugu wrote:
> Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>> Harsha Godugu wrote:
>>> Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>>>> charlie hunt wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Do we currently include a release number of Grizzly within the
>>>>> grizzly jar file(s) ?
>>>>
>>>> The maven artifact (jar) contains, under the META-folder, that
>>>> information. Do you think that's enough?
>>> May not be enough :-)
>>> Can we make it a bit simpler. Like providing a script or runtime api
>>> to know the current version of Grizzly.
>>> (This should check the checksum of the said Grizzly jar and then if
>>> and only if the checksum is matches the released/promoted jar , it
>>> should output the current version of Grizzly at that instant. Else,
>>> it should say fingerprints do not match !)
>>
>> That requires a lot of works (Maven does that BTW when downloading
>> the jars) :-) Would you volunteer to do it? I'm all for it :-) At
>> least can you file an RFE so we don't forget?
> Ok, I will file an RFE and can volunteer for this work. (with a
> Priority p3). I will check with Ken C too.
>
> For now, the other proposed code (by Alan W) seems like easy. But, we
> shouldn't hard code the version numbers. These should be generated
> during the build time. And the proposed class file should read that
> information from (say) a build file and then use that data to let the
> user know the current version.
I don't particularly like the idea of reading from a file at runtime.
That could become a performance issue.
I'd rather see the version number get populated in the java source file
at build time as part of the grizzly build procedure. Perhaps that's
the place where a version number is read from a file, (at grizzly build
time, not runtime)? I think maintaining the version number should be
something that is part of the release procedure.
charlie ...
>
> Thanks,
> Harsha
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>
>>
>>>
>>> -hg
>>>>
>>>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> charlie ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Alan Williamson wrote:
>>>>>> prefixing "grizzly" is a nice bonus, and gives confidence we are
>>>>>> actually downloading the right beast!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to propose two changes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (1) Rename archetype produced by Maven and happens 'grizzly' for
>>>>>>> the jar, e.g.:
>>>>>>> What peoples thinks? Everybody (not only commiters) can talk!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>
--
Charlie Hunt
Java Performance Engineer
<http://java.sun.com/docs/performance/>