Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>
>
> charlie hunt wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Do we currently include a release number of Grizzly within the
>> grizzly jar file(s) ?
>
> The maven artifact (jar) contains, under the META-folder, that
> information. Do you think that's enough?
May not be enough :-)
Can we make it a bit simpler. Like providing a script or runtime api to
know the current version of Grizzly.
(This should check the checksum of the said Grizzly jar and then if and
only if the checksum is matches the released/promoted jar , it should
output the current version of Grizzly at that instant. Else, it should
say fingerprints do not match !)
-hg
>
> -- Jeanfrancois
>
>>
>> charlie ...
>>
>> Alan Williamson wrote:
>>> prefixing "grizzly" is a nice bonus, and gives confidence we are
>>> actually downloading the right beast!
>>>
>>> Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to propose two changes:
>>>>
>>>> (1) Rename archetype produced by Maven and happens 'grizzly' for
>>>> the jar, e.g.:
>>>> What peoples thinks? Everybody (not only commiters) can talk!
>>>>
>>>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>