DONE:
2.3 going forward has a minimum requirement of 1.7.
3.0 will be 1.8.
> Ryan Lubke <mailto:ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com>
> March 1, 2017 at 22:52
> So, I'm working on the AHC issue internally. Will report once I have
> more to share.
>
> Regarding JDK versions, for 2.3.30, I'd like to switch to 1.7 as the
> minimum JDK and leverage those features of that language level.
> Grizzly 3.0, shift to 1.8. Anyone who wishes to contribute to
> JDK8-ifying 3.0 is welcome to do so.
>
> Please speak up if a shift to 1.7 for 2.3 is a no-go. If I don't hear
> from anyone against the transition my March 8, I'll consider the issue
> closed
> and make the appropriate changes to the pom files.
>
> Thanks,
> -rl
>
>
> Bongjae Chang <mailto:bongjae.chang_at_gmail.com>
> January 12, 2017 at 21:50
> Hi Ryan,
>
> I also think JDK8 sounds great for 2.4 or 3.0. :)
> But we have a headache with AHC. :(
>
> Regards,
> Bongjae Chang
>
>
> From: Ryan Lubke <ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com <mailto:ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com>>
> Organization: Oracle Corporation
> Reply-To: <users_at_grizzly.java.net <mailto:users_at_grizzly.java.net>>
> Date: Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 8:20 AM
> To: <users_at_grizzly.java.net <mailto:users_at_grizzly.java.net>>,
> <dev_at_grizzly.java.net <mailto:dev_at_grizzly.java.net>>
> Subject: JDK Versions
>
> Hey Folks,
>
> I wanted to touch base with the Grizzly community to get an idea of
> what JDK versions everyone is using Grizzly with.
>
> 2.3 is still compatible with 1.6, however, at some point we'll need to
> pull the plug on that compatibility. I'm trying to get a sense of how
> large of a leap we can make.
>
> Ideally, I'd like to transition to 8. What do you guys think?
>
> Thanks,
> -rl
> Ryan Lubke <mailto:ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com>
> January 11, 2017 at 15:20
> Hey Folks,
>
> I wanted to touch base with the Grizzly community to get an idea of
> what JDK versions everyone is using Grizzly with.
>
> 2.3 is still compatible with 1.6, however, at some point we'll need to
> pull the plug on that compatibility. I'm trying to get a sense of how
> large of a leap we can make.
>
> Ideally, I'd like to transition to 8. What do you guys think?
>
> Thanks,
> -rl