So, I'm working on the AHC issue internally. Will report once I have
more to share.
Regarding JDK versions, for 2.3.30, I'd like to switch to 1.7 as the
minimum JDK and leverage those features of that language level.
Grizzly 3.0, shift to 1.8. Anyone who wishes to contribute to
JDK8-ifying 3.0 is welcome to do so.
Please speak up if a shift to 1.7 for 2.3 is a no-go. If I don't hear
from anyone against the transition my March 8, I'll consider the issue
closed
and make the appropriate changes to the pom files.
Thanks,
-rl
> Bongjae Chang <mailto:bongjae.chang_at_gmail.com>
> January 12, 2017 at 21:50
> Hi Ryan,
>
> I also think JDK8 sounds great for 2.4 or 3.0. :)
> But we have a headache with AHC. :(
>
> Regards,
> Bongjae Chang
>
>
> From: Ryan Lubke <ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com <mailto:ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com>>
> Organization: Oracle Corporation
> Reply-To: <users_at_grizzly.java.net <mailto:users_at_grizzly.java.net>>
> Date: Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 8:20 AM
> To: <users_at_grizzly.java.net <mailto:users_at_grizzly.java.net>>,
> <dev_at_grizzly.java.net <mailto:dev_at_grizzly.java.net>>
> Subject: JDK Versions
>
> Hey Folks,
>
> I wanted to touch base with the Grizzly community to get an idea of
> what JDK versions everyone is using Grizzly with.
>
> 2.3 is still compatible with 1.6, however, at some point we'll need to
> pull the plug on that compatibility. I'm trying to get a sense of how
> large of a leap we can make.
>
> Ideally, I'd like to transition to 8. What do you guys think?
>
> Thanks,
> -rl
> Ryan Lubke <mailto:ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com>
> January 11, 2017 at 15:20
> Hey Folks,
>
> I wanted to touch base with the Grizzly community to get an idea of
> what JDK versions everyone is using Grizzly with.
>
> 2.3 is still compatible with 1.6, however, at some point we'll need to
> pull the plug on that compatibility. I'm trying to get a sense of how
> large of a leap we can make.
>
> Ideally, I'd like to transition to 8. What do you guys think?
>
> Thanks,
> -rl