Re: Is Faban untilized to help grizzly's measuring performance?
> I built wrk on Ubuntu Lucid Lynx and run a few performance tests
> against two stacks of restful implementation( jetty-jersey-apache
> CXF-spring vs grizzly-jersey ). With JDK7's tools jmc and jvisualvm
> being turned on, grizzly (2.3.7) utlized a limited size thread pool
> to handle request and response of http restful web services. In
> contrast to the little new threads being created in Grizzly , jetty
> created excessive threads which were not closed in the end of test.
> I saw somewhere that Jetty has a switch to turn on its NIO
> implementation, do your guys know this jetty NIO enabling features ?
I don't :)
WBR,
Alexey.
>
> The Best,
>
> Ming Qin- mingqin.wordpress.com
> Cell Phone 949-388-9898
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 5:21 PM, Oleksiy Stashok
> <oleksiy.stashok_at_oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi Ming Qin,
>
> yes, Faban is one of the tools we use, another one is wrk [1].
> Faban is java, so you can use it on any platform, but it gives you
> less TPS comparing to wrk. On the other side wrk doesn't support HTTP
> POST (AFAIR).
>
> Thanks.
>
> WBR,
> Alexey.
>
> [1] https://github.com/wg/wrk
>
> On 01.03.14 11:48, Ming Qin wrote:
>> Hi:
>> I am testing Grizzly and Jersey for restful web service. Would
>> your team recommend Open Source Faban (faban.org) for purpose of
>> measuring performance?
>>
>> The Best,
>> Ming Qin
>> Cell Phone 949-388-9898
>
>
>