dev@grizzly.java.net

Re: Is Faban untilized to help grizzly's measuring performance?

From: Ming Qin <mingqin1_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 07:19:30 -0800 (PST)

 Alexiy and Grizzly Developer:
  I  built  wrk on Ubuntu Lucid Lynx   and run a few performance tests against two stacks of restful implementation( jetty-jersey-apache CXF-spring  vs grizzly-jersey ). With JDK7's tools  jmc and jvisualvm being turned on,  grizzly (2.3.7)  utlized a limited size thread pool to handle request and response of http restful web services.    In contrast to the little new threads being created in Grizzly ,  jetty created  excessive threads which were not closed in the end of test.  I saw somewhere that Jetty has a switch to turn on its NIO implementation,   do your guys know this jetty NIO enabling features ?

The Best,


Ming Qin- mingqin.wordpress.com
Cell Phone 949-388-9898




On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 5:21 PM, Oleksiy Stashok <oleksiy.stashok_at_oracle.com> wrote:
 
Hi Ming Qin,

yes, Faban is one of the tools we use, another one is wrk [1].
Faban is java, so you can use it on any platform, but it gives you
    less TPS comparing to wrk. On the other side wrk doesn't support
    HTTP POST (AFAIR).

Thanks.

WBR,
Alexey.

[1] https://github.com/wg/wrk


On 01.03.14 11:48, Ming Qin wrote:

Hi:
>
>   I am testing Grizzly and Jersey for restful web service. Would your team recommend Open Source Faban (faban.org) for purpose  of measuring performance?
>
>The Best,
>Ming Qin
>Cell Phone 949-388-9898
>