Re: [Grizzly 2.0] Does the content in util need to be in its own module?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Ryan Lubke <ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:10:47 -0800

On 1/27/11 3:58 AM, Oleksiy Stashok wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> I agree, IMO there is no much sense keeping separate utils module.

OK. Changes applied.

Thanks,
-rl
>
> WBR,
> Alexey.
>
> On Jan 27, 2011, at 2:14 , Ryan Lubke wrote:
>
>> Per the subject.
>>
>> For 1.9 this made sense otherwise we had a chicken/egg problem.
>> For 2.0, it seems to me the localization classes and the associated
>> properties file
>> could be moved to the grizzly module.
>>
>> Perhaps I've missed something. If not, is there any objection to my
>> moving it?
>>
>>
>