dev@grizzly.java.net

Re: [Grizzly 2.0] Does the content in util need to be in its own module?

From: Oleksiy Stashok <oleksiy.stashok_at_oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:58:09 +0100

Hi Ryan,

I agree, IMO there is no much sense keeping separate utils module.

WBR,
Alexey.

On Jan 27, 2011, at 2:14 , Ryan Lubke wrote:

> Per the subject.
>
> For 1.9 this made sense otherwise we had a chicken/egg problem.
> For 2.0, it seems to me the localization classes and the associated
> properties file
> could be moved to the grizzly module.
>
> Perhaps I've missed something. If not, is there any objection to my
> moving it?
>
>