Right. Java 6. That's what I said. ;)
On 4/22/10 11:57 PM, Rajiv Mordani wrote:
> You mean move 1.9 to java 6. I vote +1 for that ;).
>
> - Rajiv
>
> Justin Lee wrote:
>> 1.9 is still on java5. 2.0 is java6. I'd love to move 1.9 to java5
>> but I keep getting voted down. ;)
>>
>> On 4/22/10 12:03 PM, Sebastien Dionne wrote:
>>> We didn't say that we didn't support jdk 5 last year? Shouldn't be
>>> too hard
>>> to fix
>>>
>>> On Apr 22, 2010 2:47 PM, "Justin Lee"<justin.d.lee_at_oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This module isn't java 5 compatible. We'll need to make it so or
>>> remove it
>>> from the modules list. I'll try to play with it and see what I can
>>> do but
>>> hopefully with a little heads up someone can beat me to the punch. ;)
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>