dev@grizzly.java.net

https://grizzly.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=778

From: Justin Lee <Justin.Lee_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:18:21 -0500

I'm not sure this should be fixed by adding support for mulitple
interceptors (on a ProcessorTask, e.g.). Most of the changes so far
involve altering deprecated classes which is a little contradictory. In
2.x, the planned approach would be to use the
port-unification/ProtocolFilter approach and I think we should do that
for 1.9.x as well. It's a much, much clean approach and could be done
with relatively little change to existing code. It'd just be another PF
in the chain that would halt any further execution of the chain. So
it'd be the same basic logic as the current suggested approach without
all the ugly hackery going on to retrofit this update in a non-breaking
fashion. As it is now, it's looking more and more like a breaking API
change on the 1.9.x tree and that's something we're striving to avoid.
Thoughts?