2009/11/27 rama <rama.rama_at_tiscali.it>
> Umm, could be...
>
> any change to get a LTQ updated any time soon?
> I have take a look to source code from openJDK probably a port will be
> really easy (maybe just a replace of the .java file?)
>
> At the moment, this issue is quite blocking for me :(
>
Its not so portable to java 5 anymore due to Unsafe.putOrderedObject .
Java 5 is EOL and according to martin busholz, who is a JSR166Y backporter
there are no such plans.
I have created an grizzly issue for this, and will look into it soon.
The newer versions of CLQ, LTQ are very well performing and its showing with
up to 2 digit percent shorter times in 5 minutes highly concurrent websocket
unit tests,
the low overhead from everything else makes the performance of
datastructures more pronounced.
regards
gustav trede