From: Minoru Nitta <minoru.nitta_at_jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:13:30 +0900

Salut,


 This is trivial, but I think current DefaultThreadPool seems to ignore
the name parameter (which is used as a part of the worker thread name),
even if user specifies the name to the constructor.
 The attached is my proposed patch.

Thanks.

Minoru