2009/4/23 Oleksiy Stashok <Oleksiy.Stashok_at_sun.com>
> Hi,
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm having problems coming up with something better for HTTP Client than
> Jersey Client API.
>
> What do you think of using Jersey Http Client API?
>
>
> +1
>
> During one of the meetings, when we discussed the Http client API to go
> with, we came to opinion, that it will make sense to leverage existing HTTP
> server entities like Request/Response/Cookies etc...
> Actually I'm fine with Jersey HTTP client API, just wanted to make sure.
>
> Thanks.
>
> WBR,
> Alexey.
>
>
>
> Why not starting with Jersey by removing the use of HttpURL classes from
> JDK? One way we could do is to copy the 1.0.3 version of Jersey here and
> make changes here...then later either propose them to use us or maintains
> the code :-)
>
> A+
>
> -- Jeanfrancois
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hubert
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>
>
>
http 5 spec in the client would be nice, we need it to do unit tests.
--
regards
gustav trede