Hi,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Oleksiy Stashok <Oleksiy.Stashok_at_sun.com>wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm having problems coming up with something better for HTTP Client than
> Jersey Client API.
>
> What do you think of using Jersey Http Client API?
>
>
> +1
>
> During one of the meetings, when we discussed the Http client API to go
> with, we came to opinion, that it will make sense to leverage existing HTTP
> server entities like Request/Response/Cookies etc...
> Actually I'm fine with Jersey HTTP client API, just wanted to make sure.
>
Yes you do remember it right. Though I think that resource/uri centric
approach is much more natural and will make client userfriendlier.
I still think that request and response that we have so far will get used
under the hood.
Thanks,
Hubert.
> Thanks.
>
> WBR,
> Alexey.
>
>
>
> Why not starting with Jersey by removing the use of HttpURL classes from
> JDK? One way we could do is to copy the 1.0.3 version of Jersey here and
> make changes here...then later either propose them to use us or maintains
> the code :-)
>
> A+
>
> -- Jeanfrancois
>
>