dev@grizzly.java.net

Re: (subliminal push) Please comments on Grizzly 2.0

From: John ROM <snake-john_at_gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:20:20 +0200

Hello,

>IMHO boolean looks bad.
>write(buffer, true) vs. writeAsync(buffer)
>I will prefer 2nd ;)
I think both opinions have their pros and cons but
in the moment I prefer Jeanfrancois's approach.

It's because I just prefer the shorter API and so just want to memorize
two methods. So I would handle async and blocking with
ReadFuture read(buffer,blockingBoolean,CompetionHandler,nowBoolean)

maybe I don't care about the inconvience
when using blocking calls because
I always try to go the async way(-:


> Salut,
>
> Alexey and I are having fun here:
>
> http://www.nabble.com/Grizzly-2.0%3A-Standalone-filterchain-processing-example-td19612479.html
>
> we don't agree and it would be quite nice to have at least another
> commiter to jump and tell us what he thinks.
>
> This is great work anyway :-)
>
> A+
>
> --Jeanfranmcois
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net

-- 
GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen Interessen!
Jetzt dabei sein: http://www.shortview.de/wasistshortview.php?mc=sv_ext_mf@gmx