dev@grizzly.java.net

Re: Another new NIO framework

From: Trustin Lee <이희승>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 08:01:08 +0900

Hey guys,

I was going to respond to this thread but it seems like David already
explained enough. Let me as coicise as possible. :)

On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:25:18 +0900, David M. Lloyd
<david.lloyd_at_redhat.com> wrote:

<snip/>

>>> I won't go into the differences between Netty and XNIO, but suffice to
>>> say that Netty is not an "NIO framework" either; rather it's a codec
>>> framework, which uses NIO (or alternately, XNIO) as a lower transport
>>> layer.
>> Netty support XNIO? Or it is planned?
>
> I believe so, though I don't want to speak for Trustin. Perhaps he will
> notice this thread and add his comments. :)

It's planned. Probably next week's third milestone? Netty doesn't have
support for UDP so it would be a good idea to support UDP via XNIO (and of
course TCP.)

HTE,

-- 
Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/