Let's put this on the agenda too. We still use the
thread-per-connection model
for the SocketFactory case in CORBA: should we again consider
supporting this in
Grizzly?
Does anyone know how Linux + NPTL compares with Solaris threads, and
especially
how this is used in the JVM?
Thanks,
Ken.
-------- Original Message --------
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: NIO vs NPTL+standard IO
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:07:47 +0100
From: Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org>
Reply-To: dev@mina.apache.org
To: dev@mina.apache.org
Today I found another blog post on the "usual" topic:
http://mailinator.blogspot.com/2008/02/kill-myth-please-nio-is-not-faster-than.html
Is this FUD or a new trend that MINA should take care of?
Is there any plan to support standard IO as a transport for MINA based
applications?
It would be useful to understand how a MINA based application could
"switch back" to multithreaded standard IO and result in better
throughput on modern JVM/OS.
Thank you,
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@grizzly.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@grizzly.dev.java.net