Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
> Oleksiy Stashok wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> IMHO this bug should be closed.
>> Don't think we really need this extension to apply to our
>> AttributeHolder implementation.
>> As attributes are used both inside Grizzly framework and outside, by
>> developers, it's difficult to make any assumptions about possible
>> parameter types.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I agree :-)
>
> -- Jeanfrancoid
I disagree :-(
Reason.. think about a generic use-case of Collections (since you are
using a Map..) in the places where we /Grizzly is using Keys .. for
example, in SlectorHandler, Collector, Context... What would be the
BEST to describe an attribute in a collection, in the context of
grizzly's Context, SelectorHandler, Controller? does it really a String
type? Actually, the way Grizzly using the *term* attribute is not even
appropriate. Why? attribute is something that describes a specific
distinguishable feature of the particular object (or instance). The way
grizzly uses here is, to store SOME objects and their references, in
case it needs at various scopes. This forces users to "create" their
own strings?keys (to accommodate in) to retrieve the references.
Take the case of grizzly's Context which ALSO acts as an AttributeHolder.
If I read the API for the latest Context.java... what does it say -
"Used to share objects b/w ProtocolFilter"
Now, if I want to use this place-holder to STORE my objects , what's the
best way to identify my collection of Objects in a Grizzly's Context.
Does it really a String?
Since we can not go back, now we ought to stick to the one in place.
Thats where we are.
-hg
>
>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> WBR,
>> Alexey.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Subject:
>> [Issue 53] AttributeHolder needs maps with parameterized types <T>
>> From:
>> jfarcand_at_dev.java.net
>> Date:
>> Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:28:23 +0000
>> To:
>> issues_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>
>> To:
>> issues_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>> https://grizzly.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53
>>
>>
>>
>> User jfarcand changed the following:
>>
>> What |Old value |New value
>> ================================================================================
>>
>> Priority|P1 |P3
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------- Additional comments from jfarcand_at_dev.java.net Thu Feb 14
>> 22:28:23 +0000 2008 -------
>> Not a p1 IMO
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>