Hi Jim, thanks again.
Yeah, I probably miss that, sorry, I'm gonna try it :-)
Thanks.
On 6/3/09 11:44 AM, "Jim Driscoll" <Jim.Driscoll_at_Sun.COM> wrote:
> From the JSF 2 PDL docs for validator:
>
> for - If present, this attribute refers to the value of one of the
> exposed attached objects within the composite component inside of which
> this tag is nested.
>
> From your comment, it seems like you didn't realize it was there.
>
> Jim
>
> On 6/3/09 7:39 AM, Jim Driscoll wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/2/09 9:49 PM, Paulo Cesar Reis wrote:
>>> Hi Jim, thanks for the answer.
>>>
>>> Yes, that would be better but my composite component looks like this:
>>> <composite:implementation>
>>> <h:panelGroup>
>>> <h:inputText id="someId" value="someValue" />
>>> </h:panelGroup>
>>>
>>> </composite:implementation>
>>
>>
>> If you have a using page of
>> <comp:component id="one">
>> <f:validateLength for="two" minimum="3" maximum="5"/>
>> </comp:component>
>>
>> and a component of:
>>
>> <composite:implementation>
>> <h:panelGroup>
>> <h:inputText id="two" value="someValue" />
>> </h:panelGroup>
>> </composite:implementation>
>>
>> Then it should work, and not attach to the panelgroup, but the
>> inputText. I think. I'm not sure, and I don't know if I'll have time to
>> test it today - I'd have already written the sample code if I was back
>> at my desk, but being on the road makes it more difficult.
>>
>>> So with f:param I can do what I want but it doesn't work.
>>
>> Right, because that use of f:param isn't supported by JSF - f:param is
>> defined on an on component basis, and we haven't really had anyone ask
>> for this before now.
>>
>>> Faces could have a
>>> for attribute for components like converters and validators (<f:converter
>>> converterId="someId" for="componentId" />) so I could attach them
>>> outside of
>>> the component.
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean here, since that's exactly what I was getting
>> at in my last mail - maybe I wasn't clear.
>>
>> If I get a chance, I'll try and code something today, though I might
>> take until tomorrow night to get it done, based on availability. Or, as
>> I said before, you could always give it a go and let me know if it works
>> - I don't think we've tried this before, but I think it should work.
>>
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: webtier-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: webtier-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: webtier-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: webtier-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>