users@glassfish.java.net

RE: GF4 complains about CDI failures, but I do not use CDI ...

From: Martin Gainty <mgainty_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:00:33 -0400

Marcus makes a good point

If there are no beans to serve up then why is GF4 framework using CDI?
I think these bugs could be easily mitigated if GF4 was OpenSourced and placed as an ASF Podling

In this way the Apache devs could report, fix and one-off branch or merge to trunk any show-stopping bugs as well as roll in new features (e.g. JSR implementations)

 

http://incubator.apache.org/faq.html

 

+1 for transferring codebase and control of GF as OpenSource Project to Apache Podling


(I will volunteer as sponsor)
Martin
______________________________________________
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung

Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.

  


> To: users_at_glassfish.java.net
> Subject: Re: GF4 complains about CDI failures, but I do not use CDI ...
> From: forums_at_java.net
> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 03:04:43 -0500
>
> So do I understand correctly: GF4 has CDI enabled by default, even for EAR
> not containing a beans.xml file? Is that a new Java EE 7 feature, or just a
> GF4 trick?
>
> --
>
> [Message sent by forum member 'mkarg']
>
> View Post: http://forums.java.net/node/898688
>
>