users@glassfish.java.net

Re: Initial Context : Bad IIOP profile returned

From: Olivier Chorier <lapsus63_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 08:28:24 +0100

Hi Martin,

Thanks a lot for your reply, but I'm not sure to understand what you mean
my "is not configured".
Do I have to check my IIOP listeners or is it a different problem ?

I tried not to change them, as default orb listener using 0.0.0.0.

But I tried the following too :
Update the first listener to 192.168.2.250 and make a second listener bound
to 192.168.3.250.

In both cases, I can't access the server.
Olivier.


2013/1/9 Martin Gainty <mgainty_at_hotmail.com>

> Hi Olivier-
>
> apparently 192.168.2.250 is configured completely..(the reason why
> 192.168.2.250:13700 works)
>
> apparently 192.168.3.250 is not configured at all so a GIOP request to
> 192.168.3.250:13700 forwards to
> *192.168.2.250:13700*
>
> Martin
> ______________________________________________
> Note de déni et de confidentialité
>
> Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lapsus63_at_gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 19:40:42 +0100
> Subject: Initial Context : Bad IIOP profile returned
> To: users_at_glassfish.java.net
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Here's my configuration :
> - My computer : Win XP, Eclipse, 192.168.1.1/24
> - Server : Glassfish 3.1.2.2, 2
> - 192.168.2.250/24 available for customers only
> - 192.168.3.250/24 available for developers only
> - port 13700 for IIOP default listener (0.0.0.0). (We tried to make 2
> listeners, see further)
>
> First of all, customers don't have problems to access EJBs from the
> application (standalone Swing).
> From the developpers side, we can build an initial context, but we can't
> lookup EJBs. We can ping GIOP : http://192.168.3.250:13700 returns GIOP
>
> Here are the properties sent to Initial Context :
> <properties>
> <entry key="org.omg.CORBA.ORBInitialPort">13700</entry>
> <entry
> key="java.naming.factory.initial">com.sun.enterprise.naming.SerialInitContextFactory</entry>
> <entry key="fr.crosstalk.HTTPInitialPort">8080</entry>
> <entry key="org.omg.CORBA.ORBInitialHost">192.168.2.250</entry>
> <entry key="fr.crosstalk.HTTPSInitialPort">8181</entry>
> <entry
> key="java.naming.factory.state">com.sun.corba.ee.impl.presentation.rmi.JNDIStateFactoryImpl</entry>
> <entry
> key="java.naming.factory.url.pkgs">com.sun.enterprise.naming</entry>
> </properties>
>
>
> When calling EJB, we get stuck at this stack trace :
> Net.connect(FileDescriptor, InetAddress, int, int) line: not available
> [native method]
> SocketChannelImpl.connect(SocketAddress) line: 532
> ORBUtility.openSocketChannel(SocketAddress) line: 110
> IIOPSSLSocketFactory.createSocket(String, InetSocketAddress) line: 324
> SocketOrChannelConnectionImpl.<init>(ORB, CorbaContactInfo, boolean,
> boolean, String, String, int) line: 242
> SocketOrChannelConnectionImpl.<init>(ORB, CorbaContactInfo, String,
> String, int) line: 270
> SocketOrChannelContactInfoImpl.createConnection() line: 129
> CorbaClientRequestDispatcherImpl.beginRequest(Object, String, boolean,
> CorbaContactInfo) line: 223
> CorbaClientDelegateImpl.request(Object, String, boolean) line: 228
> CorbaClientDelegateImpl.is_a(Object, String) line: 393
> CORBAObjectImpl(ObjectImpl)._is_a(String) line: 112
> NamingContextHelper.narrow(Object) line: 69
> SerialContext$ProviderCacheKey.getNameService() line: 1239
> SerialContext.getRemoteProvider() line: 410
> SerialContext.getProvider() line: 346
> SerialContext.lookup(String, int) line: 504
> SerialContext.lookup(String) line: 455
> InitialContext.lookup(String) line: 392
>
>
> So, we used Wireshark in order to analyze the server response from
> Glassfish.
> I'll try to report interesting frames only...
>
> Frame 299
> From 192.168.1.1 To 192.168.3.250 Protocol NBNS
> Name Query NBSTAT *<00><00>........ type NBSTAT, class IN
>
> Frame 301
> From 192.168.3.250 To 192.168.1.1 Protocol ICMP
> Destination unreachable (Port unreachable)
>
> Maybe the previous error (appeared 3 times) raises the following ones I
> don't know :
>
> Frame 320 ; 321 ; 322 : SYN / ACK caids-sensor > 13700
>
> Frame 323
> From 192.168.1.1 To 192.168.3.250 Protocol GIOP
> Request operation : _is_a
> Context_data : .......(IDL:
> omg.org/SendingContext/CodeBase:1.0.........j.........192.168.1.1.......e................&..<http://omg.org/SendingContext/CodeBase:1.0.........j.........192.168.1.1.......e................%26..>
> ..
> Type ID : IDL:omg.org/CosNaming/NamingContext:1.0
>
> Frame 325
> From 192.168.3.250 To 192.168.1.1 Protocol GIOP
> GIOP 1.2 Reply
> Reply status : Location forward (3)
> ServiceContextID : SendingContextRunTime(6)
> context_data: .......(IDL:
> omg.org/SendingContext/CodeBase:1.0.....................192.168.2.250..................d...........................
> ...................
> ...............&...........!...x...............$.......f............1
> IOR::type_id: IDL:omg.org/CosNaming/NamingContextExt:1.0
> IIOP::Profile_host: 192.168.2.250
> IIOP::Profile_port: 13700
>
>
> Here is the problem : the GIOP response, frame 325, returns the
> customer-side IP (192.168.2.250) instead of the developers one
> (192.168.3.250).
> (I think this is the problem)
>
> I thought I had to make a new ORB listener. One for customers, one for
> developers :
>
> orb-listener1: Address 192.168.2.250 Port 13700
> orb-listener2: Address 192.168.3.250 Port 13701
>
> After restarting Glassfish and updating the context properties, nothing
> better happened.
>
> Does anybody have an idea ? I've googled for many hours, and tested many
> options, but found nothing that worked.
> Could it be a glassfish / orb / omg / ior issue ? Is is resolved in a
> snapshot release ?
>
> Thanks very much for your help.
> Olivier.
>