Please consider that this might not be a bug but an improvement.
The old GF version might not have been CAPABLE of storing this amount of files, and the new version does.
Search your code for errors or forgotten "file close" statements.
Kind regards,
The out-side
Op 12 okt. 2012 om 10:43 heeft forums_at_java.net het volgende geschreven:
> Hi, just to give a small feedback on this one:) We expiriance the same
> problem on GF3.1.2.2 build5...
> [#|2012-10-04T15:53:52.118+0200|WARNING|glassfish3.1.2|com.sun.grizzly.config.GrizzlyServiceListener|_ThreadID=12;_ThreadName=Thread-3;|GRIZZLY0006:
> Exception accepting channel java.io.IOException: Too many open files at
> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method) at
> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:145)
> at
> com.sun.grizzly.TCPSelectorHandler.acceptWithoutRegistration(TCPSelectorHandler.java:745)
> at
> com.sun.enterprise.v3.services.impl.monitor.MonitorableSelectorHandler.acceptWithoutRegistration(MonitorableSelectorHandler.java:99)
> at
> com.sun.grizzly.http.SelectorThreadHandler.onAcceptInterest(SelectorThreadHandler.java:99)
> at
> com.sun.grizzly.SelectorHandlerRunner.handleSelectedKey(SelectorHandlerRunner.java:301)
> at
> com.sun.grizzly.SelectorHandlerRunner.handleSelectedKeys(SelectorHandlerRunner.java:263)
> at
> com.sun.grizzly.SelectorHandlerRunner.doSelect(SelectorHandlerRunner.java:200)
> at com.sun.grizzly.SelectorHandlerRunner.run(SelectorHandlerRunner.java:132)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) |#] Any attempt of the application
> to open file ended with this kind of error, because happened during night and
> Im not a linux guru:) I didnt know how to clean the tx files, so I tried
> restarting the machine and starting gf again but no luck, then comes the fun
> part I stop again glasfish and start gf 3.0.1 and this one worked without any
> problem... Blaze
>
> --
>
> [Message sent by forum member 'baze985']
>
> View Post: http://forums.java.net/node/891367
>
>