users@glassfish.java.net

Re: Hide the 8181 port in URL

From: Arthur Yeo <artyyeo_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 07:53:46 -0700

Dominik,
iptables should nicely.
I guess if there's a dedicated load-balancer such as BigIP or some kind of
frontend traffic ctrlr, incoming requests can be remapped.

Thanks,
Art


On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Dominik Dorn <dominik.dorn_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> It is only possible to not append the port in the url, if you're using
> the default port
> for the specific protocol:
> http -> 80
> https -> 443
> ftp -> 21
> etc.
>
> if you want to get https without adding the port, then you'll have to
> create a server internal
> forwarding.
>
> there are several possible ways to do this,
> mod_proxy
> mod_jk
> iptables (
> http://dominikdorn.com/2010/04/tomcat-glassfish-jetty-port-80-iptables-nat/
> )
>
> hope that helps
>
> dominik
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Arthur Yeo <artyyeo_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > All,
> > Obviously, if I were to reconfigure GF to use 443 for its secure channel,
> my
> > https URL will now be able to skip using the port since it is the old std
> > SSL port.
> > If I were to keep the 8181 port (or use any other non-std port), is there
> to
> > configure it so that the URL does not need to specify the port?
> >
> > --
> > Arthur Y.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dominik Dorn
> http://dominikdorn.com
> http://twitter.com/domdorn
>
> Tausche Deine Lernunterlagen auf http://www.studyguru.eu !
>



-- 
Arthur Y.