users@glassfish.java.net

Re: Portable but custom global EJB names - are they really portable?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: <glassfish_at_javadesktop.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:21:16 PDT

> Could you point me to the specification which says
> anything about it? I really tried to find it, but
> either I am looking incorrectly, or I don't know.

Java EE 6 specification, sections EE.5.2.2 and following.

Best,
Laird
[Message sent by forum member 'ljnelson']

http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=477545

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Theodor Richard: "Re: Glassfish Roadmap: Stability vs. Features"
Previous message: glassfish_at_javadesktop.org: "Re: Glassfish V3 Standalone JMS Client - Question"
In reply to: glassfish_at_javadesktop.org: "Re: Portable but custom global EJB names - are they really portable?"
Next in thread: glassfish_at_javadesktop.org: "Re: Portable but custom global EJB names - are they really portable?"
Reply: glassfish_at_javadesktop.org: "Re: Portable but custom global EJB names - are they really portable?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]