Weird -- I just noticed that the exclude-unlisted-classes element is
in one persistence unit but not the other. For what it's worth, the
example application I'm working on now works just fine without it.
(The only elements I have inside "persistence-unit" are "provider" and
"jta-data-source.")
Cheers,
Bobby
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <persistence version="2.0"
> xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_2_0.xsd
> ">
>
> <!-- this is the type I think you don't want -->
> <persistence-unit name="your_name_here1" transaction-
> type="RESOURCE_LOCAL">
> <provider>org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.PersistenceProvider</
> provider>
> <exclude-unlisted-classes>false</exclude-unlisted-classes>
> <properties>
> <property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.url" value="jdbc:derby://
> localhost:1527/sun-appserv-samples"/>
> <property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.password" value="APP"/>
> <property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.driver"
> value="org.apache.derby.jdbc.ClientDriver"/>
> <property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.user" value="APP"/>
> <property name="eclipselink.ddl-generation" value="create-
> tables"/>
> </properties>
> </persistence-unit>
>
> <!-- this is the JTA type. let GFv3 handle the details. -->
> <persistence-unit name="your_name_here2" transaction-type="JTA">
> <provider>org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.PersistenceProvider</
> provider>
> <jta-data-source>jdbc/your_jndi_name_here</jta-data-source>
> <properties>
> <property name="eclipselink.ddl-generation" value="create-
> tables"/>
> </properties>
> </persistence-unit>
>
> </persistence>