users@glassfish.java.net

Re: Dissapointed

From: Adam Jenkins <adamjenkinstmpredirect_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:29:28 -0700 (PDT)

Most places I've worked, and I think the redhat guys, use the following rule of thumb. P1 must: 1) Be in a currently supported production version (not EOL'd or beta/preview/rc release) 2) Must be a bug, not an enhancement 3) Must be consistently reproducable, with steps to reproduce attached to the bug 4) Must be a blocker, with no workaround. Just an FYI there :) --- On Sun, 12/7/09, Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart <pelegri@sun.com> wrote: > From: Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart <pelegri@sun.com> > Subject: Re: Dissapointed > To: users@glassfish.dev.java.net, "Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart" <pelegri@sun.com> > Received: Sunday, 12 July, 2009, 7:24 AM > Let me talk with some folks on Monday > about what we can do on the triage/evaluation front. > > At Sun we traditionally use separate concepts of priority > and severity, one indicating the impact on the user > (user-controled value) and the other the prioritized impact > (team-controlled value).  Bugzilla only has one value, > which is a problem. > >     - eduard/o > > > Adam Jenkins wrote: > > > May I suggest that you modify bugzilla so that the > general public can't submit P1 issues?  > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@glassfish.dev.java.net > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@glassfish.dev.java.net > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Access Yahoo!7 Mail on your mobile. Anytime. Anywhere. Show me how: http://au.mobile.yahoo.com/mail