Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
> Thanks. Focusing on v3 might be the biggest RoI. Also GFv3 TP2 has
> proven very solid and it is in much better shape than its name suggests.
>
Is there an objective way to determine just what "shape" GFV3 is in?
It is strongly stated to not use it for production but if there are no
big broken things, I'd like to risk it.
Is it still evolving rapidly? Or is it "done" but untested? And, I
know the spec isn't final yet but I don't care about that just yet.
Thanks for any insight.